Flynn/Kislyak Calls Released and Senator Mark Warner IN PANIC MODE
This should be very interesting to see the media response to this declass!
An interesting couple of things happened just as Richard Grenell passed the sunlight baton to DNI John Ratcliffe. First, SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner is angered about the sunlight Grenell has delivered. Second, former AAG Matt Whitaker outlines how the Mueller investigation threatened him. Both issues merge (outlined below).
Michael Flynn’s defense attorney Sidney Powell appears on FBN with Liz MacDonald to discuss recent events. WATCH:
Listen to Sidney Powell, General Flynn’s attorney, describe the situation:
When considering that Robert Mueller was used as a weapon (threat) and a shield (bury information); and when considering Senator Mark Warner’s recent protestations against Grenell; it is well worth going back in history to May 2018 when SSCI Vice-Chairman Warner was demanding the Mueller investigation must not allow congressional oversight.Yes, it now makes sense, why Senator Mark Warner was demanding DAG Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray must keep records from congress.
According to Mark Warner in May 2018, it would be “irresponsible” and “potentially illegal” for congressional oversight to keep demanding records from the FBI and DOJ about their spying and surveillance activity against the campaign of Donald Trump.
Now the statements yesterday by AAG Matt Whitaker make sense.
Within an interesting interview conducted by Jan Jekielek of Epoch Times, former AAG Matt Whitaker confirms the Mueller investigation was used by corrupt interests within the special counsel’s office to threaten any/all executive branch and congressional officials with “obstruction of justice” charges if they revealed any exculpatory or counter-narrative information during the Mueller probe. (read more)
Additionally, Senator Mark Warner carried a massive conflict because he was an active participant in the legislative side of the soft coup effort.
You see, when Dianne Feinstein stepped down as Vice-Chair from the Senate Intel Committee after the 2016 election, it was Mark Warner who took her place. This puts Warner on the Gang-of-Eight starting January 3, 2017.
Coincidentally, the Gang-of-Eight conduct all oversight over DOJ and FBI covert and counterintelligence operations…. including those covert actions that took place in 2016.
It gets better….
Senator Mark Warner holds a vested interest in making sure that no-one ever gets to the bottom of the 2016 political weaponization, spying and surveillance operation. Hence Mark Warner was/is furious with the efforts of Ric Grenell as DNI.
Now, for more motive for Senator Warner to keep sunlight from the operation, listen carefully to the opening statement from former CIA Director John Brennan May 23rd, 2017, during his testimony to congress.
Pay very close attention to the segment…
So when CIA Director John Brennan was providing “individual” briefings to each of the gang-of-eight members (pictured above), they were accompanied by one senior staff. That means a personal, individualized, briefing to Dianne Feinstein and Dan Jones.
The same Dan Jones who participated in the 2016 Brennan briefings, is the same Dan Jones who continued paying for Christopher Steele’s involvement after the Trump inauguration (ie. payoff); and the same Dan Jones who was a liaison visiting Senator Mark Warner to help continue the effort.
Things making sense now?
Now we see why Senator Mark Warner did not want a “paper trail”…
What happened to the Mueller hype?
What happened to the Mueller will take down POTUS threats [@JohnBrennan]?
Was MUELLER the ‘insurance’ policy aka BLOCKADE designed to limit/restrict POTUS’ ability to enforce the law?
New talking points being pushed backing away from Mueller as the savior re: excuse A, excuse B, excuse C?
Why are *new* investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he’s stated for almost (2) years, ‘evidence’ exists that ties POTUS to Russia?
If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
First they pushed for a SC.
Now they claim the SC didn’t look deep enough?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED – HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED – HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT?
Are *new* investigations designed to be an ‘insurance’ extension?
Designed to prevent POTUS from CLEANING HOUSE?
Attack on political opponent(s) who is/are actively conducting (leading) investigations into the President for XYZ charges beyond Mueller for XYZ reasons (zero evidence to support) – OBSTRUCTION TRAP?
[SDNY] opening ‘private’ investigation for the sole purpose of FINDING A CRIME?
Evidence to support?
Does [SDNY] report to AG BARR?
Watch the news.
[MW] opening *new* investigations into the ‘finances’ of POTUS and/or his family?
Why did D’s state ‘things will calm down if we retake the House’ prior to the midterm elections?
Was their plan to retake the House in order to ‘chair’ each respective committee in order to start *new* erroneous investigations in an attempt to retain the BLOCKADE?
Retain the ‘insurance’ policy?
Retain the optical illusion that a crime was committed?
Retain the narrative?
Retain D_base outrage?
Retain D_base obstruction?
Retain D_base support to block POTUS’ agenda?
If you know your opponents move, what advantages that does present?
If you have the TRUTH on your side, what advantages does that present?
If you have full control of the US MIL, what advantages does that present?
If you have complete AUTH TO DECLAS, what advantages does that present?
If you have the SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (PATRIOTS), what advantages does that present?
DO NOT TRUST THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
YOU ARE THE MAJORITY.
MUELLER > DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE
THE GREAT AWAKENING.
YOU ARE THE NEWS NOW.